Making them up as I go (2)

1. Tell the truth.
2. Entice, or fail.
3. To emphasize, summarize.
4. If it ain't short, it don't work.
5. Be clear.


And so I don't forget:
Don't explain. Just tell a story.
Don't argue. Just say things that make sense.
Expect people to be bored by the writing, and shorten it.
Make the wording easy to take.

Remove Loose Ends -- the interesting one-liners that go nowhere.

Friday, December 11, 2020

If and when

 Proofreading. Tweaking words, really. I come to this sentence:

In the United States, and elsewhere that finance has grown, long-term economic decline develops along with finance if finance creates cost-push pressure and policy reduces the resulting inflation.

Difficult to read. Difficult topic, economics, because you can't just say "foot": you have to say "the foot that's connected at the ankle to the leg". All the concepts have to be laid out tediously.

No problem. Look at simpler concepts:

In the United States and elsewhere, B happens if A happens.

No. Shorter:

B happens if A happens.
Usually, the order is different, in causal sequence, like this:

If A then B

But this is not what I'm trying to say. I want to say

When A then B

or

B happens when A happens.
//

Logically, it seems to me, they are the same, "If A then B" and "When A then B". But when I go back to my tedious phrases instead of capital letters, "when" is the word I want to use.

Why? (And this is the reason for today's post, to consider why "when" is better for me here.)

To understand "B happens if A happens" I have to grab B and keep it in mind, grab A and keep it in mind, and then compare the two, looking for the relationship between A and B that makes the sentence make sense.

But to understand "B happens when A happens" I have to grab them both, but the relationship between them is only pointed out.

When I use "if" I'm saying there is some relation between A and B, but I don't say what that relation is. When I use "when" I simply acknowledge that the relation exists. That satisfies the reader in me. I can still ask "why" B happens when A happens, but that's a separate thought that develops the idea.

Using "B happens if A happens" I can't get out of that thought without wondering "why", and the absence of an answer in that same sentence makes the sentence unsatisfying. I don't want to put the answer in the same sentence because there is enough tedium in that sentence already. And because the purpose of the essay is to emphasize that the relation between A and B exists, not to explain it.

So, I change the word "if" to "when" and that solves my problem.

In the United States, and elsewhere that finance has grown, long-term economic decline develops along with finance when finance creates cost-push pressure and policy reduces the resulting inflation.

//

Good grief! That's a lot of struggle over one word in one sentence.

But yes, if I say this happens if that happens, the sentence feels unfinished. It wants a "because" and an explanation: This happens if that happens because yadda yadda. 

"When" it is, then.


Thursday, August 6, 2020

Dashing!

Swear to god, the first time I saw this I thought they meant HOW to RUT them, and wondered What's a FREE TURN anyway? It sounds like something you'd get in a video game, not on a lawn mower:


That's why god invented the dash. RUT-FREE TURNS, DAMMIT. RUT-FREE, not RUT FREE.

Thursday, July 16, 2020

Word order

From ABC News: Fauci fires back at White House aide who trashed him in op-ed
Subtitle: "Let's stop this nonsense," Fauci said.
by Ben Gittleson, July 15, 2020.

This sentence:
Over the weekend, the White House provided several media outlets with a misleading list of comments made by Fauci, in an effort to undercut him.

Note: "a misleading list of comments"

I think they mean to say "a list of misleading comments", which would mean that Fauci's comments were misleading, or were thought to be misleading by the White House.

As written, the statement means ABC News finds the list of comments misleading.

Tuesday, April 28, 2020

"... Quantitative Writing ..."

For my econ blog I want to evaluate the fall in GDP that may follow from increased unemployment due to parts of the economy shutting down in response to the pandemic. A well-known link between unemployment and GDP is "Okun's law"; Google led me to an impressively useful PDF by Miles B. Cahill, on working out Okun's law in a spreadsheet.

I looked up Cahill and on his home page found a link to Teaching with Spreadsheets. Well, I had to go there! The link leads to several related pages. I want to look through it all.

In addition, the sidebar contains several links I couldn't resist visiting, including
I sure don't want to misplace these links!

Tuesday, March 31, 2020

"relatively easier" -- The Double Comparative

Eric Boehm at Reason:
"Having failed to be fiscally responsible when it would have been relatively easier, our elected officials now face an impossible choice..."
Dipshit.

Thursday, March 19, 2020